Occupation / job
Interpreters and Translators
Median annual pay. Half earn less than this.
Hourly at a standard 2,080-hour year. We do not yet have unpaid-time or cost data for this, so this is not an adjusted figure.
The middle half. A quarter earn below this range.
Source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 · view
What this figure cannot tell you
It covers people EMPLOYED in this occupation. Anyone who trained for it and was never hired is not in the median above, and neither is anyone doing the work self-employed. No verified count of qualified people exists for this occupation, so this page shows none rather than an estimate. Why that matters · The occupations where we could source it
Who this suits
Interpreters and Translators pays $60,170 against $50,020 across all occupations — $845 a month more. Every premium is paid for something: find out whether it is the schooling, the licence, the hours or the risk before you decide you want it.
52,060 people are employed as Interpreters and Translators. At that scale every large metro has a real market, and the difference between a good year and a bad one is usually which employer you are at rather than whether anyone is hiring.
This work suits people who can produce to length and to time, repeatedly, and who are not precious about being edited.
How long it takes to become one of the 52,060 people doing this is not something we have a source for. BLS counts and pays them; it does not record how they got there, and we would rather say so than guess.
Who should not do this
$34,300 separates the bottom quarter of Interpreters and Translators at $46,530 from the top quarter at $80,830. At a 1.7x ratio the midpoint is a weak guide to your own first year — find out which end you would be entering at.
At $46,530, or $22.37 an hour, the bottom quarter of this work lands within $3,490 of the $50,020 all-occupation midpoint — an unusually solid floor.
Avoid it if you need job security; this field restructures more often than almost any other here.
No failure rate is shown, and the absence is deliberate: the 52,060 figure counts people already working as Interpreters and Translators, not everyone who trained and never got hired. Without a licensing register to divide by, a rate here would be an invented denominator.
What the spread tells you
From $46,530 to $80,830 at a ratio of 1.7x is wide enough that two people with the same job title have materially different jobs. $60,170 sits in the middle of that and describes neither of them especially well.
In cash terms the middle half of Interpreters and Translators runs $46,530 to $80,830 — $34,300 a year between the 25th and 75th percentiles, against a midpoint of $60,170.
Getting to $80,830, the 75th percentile, is worth $20,660 a year more than the $60,170 midpoint and $34,300 more than the $46,530 a quarter of Interpreters and Translators settle for.
$20,660 separates $60,170 from the $80,830 top quarter, while only $13,640 separates it from $46,530. The range leans upward, which means the middle of Interpreters and Translators has more room above it than a symmetric reading of the median would suggest.
Converted to an hourly rate over a full-time year: $22.37 at the bottom quarter, $28.92 at the midpoint, $38.86 at the top quarter. The typical American job works out at $24.04 on the same basis.
What these figures are, and what they are not
This is payroll data: it comes from employers, about people they employ. Anyone doing the work of Interpreters and Translators for themselves is not in it, and there is no reason to assume $60,170 describes them.
The hourly number on this page is $60,170 divided by a 2,080-hour year and nothing more. We hold no unpaid-hours or cost data for Interpreters and Translators, so it is arithmetic rather than an effective rate.
How this is calculated · Self-employment failure rates · What credentials cost and pay back · Look up something else