WhatPays.org

Self-employment method

Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services

1,036,353 people filed as a nonemployer business under this industry code in 2022 — no payroll, no employees, just them. These are gross receipts reported to the IRS, before any expense is taken out.

$18,366

Median GROSS RECEIPTS for the year — money in, before rent, materials, fuel, insurance or tax. This is not take-home pay.

38.05%

Share who grossed under $10,000 for the whole year — before expenses.

$5,609–$54,163

The middle half, in gross receipts. A quarter of filers took less than the lower figure.

Source: US Census Bureau, Nonemployer Statistics 2022 · view

How often it does not work out

Of the 1,036,353 people who filed under this code in 2022, 38.05% grossed under $10,000 for the entire year — before a single expense was deducted.

That is a floor, not an estimate. Census publishes GROSS RECEIPTS, not net income. Everyone inside that share earned less than the figure suggests once rent, materials, mileage, insurance and self-employment tax came out — and filers who grossed well above the threshold may still have netted nothing. The true share of people who earn nothing meaningful from this is higher than the number above, never lower.

Denominator: establishments_total = 1,036,353 · US Census Bureau, Nonemployer Statistics 2022 · view

Every filer, by what they grossed

The full distribution Census publishes. The median above is interpolated inside the band that holds the 50th percentile.

Gross receipts for the year Filers Share
Under $5,000 240,030 23.2%
$5,000 to $9,999 154,252 14.9%
$10,000 to $24,999 221,153 21.4%
$25,000 to $49,999 150,638 14.6%
$50,000 to $99,999 124,614 12.0%
$100,000 to $249,999 99,544 9.6%
$250,000 to $499,999 30,225 2.9%
$500,000 to $999,999 10,447 1.0%
$1,000,000 to $2,499,999 4,361 0.4%

Who this suits

Median gross receipts of $18,366 put the typical filer somewhere between a serious side income and a failing attempt at a full-time one, and the receipts figure alone cannot tell you which.

1,036,353 people filed under this code — the scale of a major occupation, held together by nothing but tax returns. Very few are doing it full time, and the receipts distribution below is the evidence.

A 14.0% share — 145,089 filers — grossed $100,000 or more. That is well above what most codes here manage, and it says the middle of Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services is closer to a business than to a sideline.

Professional services are the classic solo business: low capital, high skill, and a ceiling set by how many hours you can sell. It suits people who can market as competently as they deliver.

Nothing stops anyone filing under this code, and 1,036,353 people did. Free entry is why the lower bands are as full as they are: the distribution below counts everyone who tried, not everyone who was ready.

Who should not do this

Bottom quarter under $5,609, top quarter over $54,163: 9.7x, or $4,046 a month. At this stretch the label has stopped describing one occupation, and every summary statistic about it — including the midpoint — should be treated with suspicion.

The bottom quarter of Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services earns under $5,609 — $44,411 below the $50,020 a typical American job pays. Entering at the bottom and waiting is a live risk here, not a theoretical one, and some people never leave that quarter.

Do not start this without a first client already. Capability does not generate demand in this subsector, and the gap between the two is where most of these businesses end.

38.0% of the 1,036,353 people who filed in 2022 grossed under $10,000 for the year — 394,332 people. Approaching half of everyone who tried Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services took in less revenue than a part-time wage, before costs.

Take it as a floor, not an estimate. The $10,000 threshold is measured on money received, before materials, rent, fuel, insurance and self-employment tax, so the true share of filers who ended the year with no income is higher than the figure shown — we simply cannot say how much higher.

What the spread tells you

From $5,609 to $54,163 is 9.7x — the shape of a field where a minority captures most of the money. The midpoint of $18,366 is arithmetic, not a forecast, and treating it as one is the standard mistake here.

The middle half of this field earns between $5,609 and $54,163. That is $48,554 of range, with $18,366 sitting inside it as the point half the field is above and half below.

Getting to $54,163, the 75th percentile, is worth $35,797 a year more than the $18,366 midpoint and $48,554 more than the $5,609 a quarter of Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services settle for.

$12,757 below the midpoint, $35,797 above it. That asymmetry is extreme even for this data, and it means every summary of Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services that is not a median — including any average you see quoted elsewhere — is describing the top of the range rather than the middle.

Converted to a 2,080-hour year, the receipts run $2.69 an hour at the 25th percentile, $8.82 at the midpoint and $26.03 at the 75th. Read them as revenue per hour worked; the equivalent wage is lower by whatever this work costs to do.

Counted straight off the return: 240,030 filers grossed under $5,000, 154,252 took $5,000 to $9,999, 221,153 took $10,000 to $24,999, 144,577 cleared $100,000 and 45,033 cleared $250,000.

What these figures are, and what they are not

Read every figure here as GROSS RECEIPTS rather than income. $18,366 is turnover — the money that passed through Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services before expenses. What is left after costs is a different and much smaller number that this dataset does not publish.

Treat the per-hour figure as a conversion. It assumes a flat full-time year against $18,366 because we have no verified record of unpaid hours or out-of-pocket costs for this work, and we would rather convert honestly than adjust invented ones.

How this is calculated · Self-employment failure rates · What credentials cost and pay back · Look up something else